Friday, February 26, 2010

IS IT A KKKK WHALE

The beloved killer whale which has been so enamored of humans that he has killed 3 of us out of curiosity will now become a major attraction at Sea World. After killing a Canadian several years ago and forcing the side show to close because the Canadians were appalled and refused to pay to see the killer, will now become a major attraction. Americans and our dulled sensitivity to murder, death and mayhem will pay millions to see the Killer Killer Killer Killer Whale. Just to have a chill run down our spine without thinking of the devastation to victims and their loved ones.

I do not fault the whale, after all he is a killer whale. By nature a mammal that devours seals about the same size as human in one gulp. This is their nature. Sea World and their dog and pony show ( or killer whale and dolphin show) attempt to change this behavior and make millions and millions of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
They claim that this is scientific research and enables us (humans) to understand more about the whales. Why do we have to change their natures and natural actions and reactions to understand more about them? It is for profit!!!
These great mammals are not being kept in a natural environment. Their day to day routines are what the humans want them to be not what they really are. What do we learn about the nature of the whale by restructuring its life to perform on cue for a fish or squid?

What we need to do is have people pay to watch as the Sea World experts toss live white baby seals into the pond every morning and we could watch the true nature of the greatest mammal predator do his thing.

Perhaps we should put serial killers on display, how many would pay $50.00 to Charles Manson, John Wayne Gasey, Pol Pot, etc? In our sick society I bet they would far offset the cost of their imprisonment
.
If a dog should bite a human there is a good chance it will be killed, certainly so if it bites twice. Should it kill a human death is only a day or so away. At least Sea World should be forced (morally they are so $$$ driven that they would never do this on their own) to either destroy ( give the blubber to the starving Eskimos or polar bears) or release it into the wild where I don't think there would be much chance of him being attracted to a pony tail. If I pull a woman's pony tail I would probably be sued for sexual harassment!

Friday, February 19, 2010

WHOA, DONKEY OR JACKASS. WHATEVER

I think that I may have alluded to the fact a third party on the right would cause a Perot Effect on conservatism. Right now there is at least one tea person running for office in New Jersey and I believe another considering running as a third party or independent for the peoples seat held by Reid in Nevada. Have these people had enough time and do they have enough money and understanding of marketing and selling a point which would allow them to really defeat the democratic position holder or would they just siphon off enough votes to allow Reid to beat both of the challengers?

For a third party candidate to win a senatorial seat they would need at least $10,000,000.00 and have a tremendous campaign strategy team, one which was willing to get down and dirty without the usual mud slinging and name calling which permeates politics today and seems to be the only tool the Tea Party folks seem to be comfortable with.

I do think that a third party would be great. However, they would certainly have to be step above Palin and Phillips and certainly much more well funded. Trying to put up a presidential candidate in the next election would be a fools errand. Congressional and senatorial seats are the true power and should be the place to start and only in a few states which are already conservative and may have had a brain freeze and elected a democrat. As few as five senate seats and perhaps twenty congressional seats could put a minority third party into a pretty powerful position. Look how the two independents who caucus with the demoncrats turn the voting in the senate!

This where the time, money, energy, talent and passion should be concentrated.

Preparedness and passion with out extremism should be the watch word.

THE LATEST CZAR POSITION?

Is it true that Obama is considering a position for National Anger Control and Management(NACA)? Will he appoint the Harvard educated PHD Amy Bishop to head it up? She would fit right in with all of the other left wing progressive nuts, felons, and high thinkers he has already appointed. She has killed at least four people,(one being her brother) wounded three others and was implicated in the attempted bombing of a Harvard Professor.

Sounds like many members of the current administration.

"TEA PARTY" CONCERNS

I would have been better served to look more deeply into the yummy recipes for a successful tea party rather than continuing on to search more deeply into the for profit Hillbilly Tea Party thrown at Opryland in Nashville.

My current major concerns deal with the for profit "Tea Party Nation" of which the leading tea cozies are Judson and Sherry Phillips. It would appear that they are less than forthright about where all of the donations to their for profit organization, which all you good folks who are as mad as hell and not going to take it any more have been sending them.

Mr Phillips is a lawyer ( and we all know that we can trust them and they are really honest) whose shtick is to dress down to appeal to his target audience. Phillips makes Matlock look downright dapper and extremely sophisticated.

Have Mr. and Mrs. Tea Party Nation told anyone or revealed to their donors where this money is being funneled? Are these funds targeted for supporting candidates, research and polling, advertising, promotion or marketing? What is the accounting for the vast amount of money you angry folks have given to the private slush fund of the Phillips? If there is not a quick, honest accounting of how your money is being spent and used beware! This could make Madoff look like a piker.

This could be the night the lights went out in Operyland because you should never trust your freedom and liberties to a backwoods southern lawyer.

Remember if only two% of Americans each sent $20.00 ( the cost of a movie for a couple without popcorn with buttery flavoring nor any sodas and certainly no candy) would amount to $100,000,000.00.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

IDJITS TO LEFT OF ME, IDJITS TO RIGHT OF ME

I was just looking at some of the information available about the "Tea Party Convention". Some liberal idjit talked about the radical position of Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-CA. For one thing he is a former representative from CO.
Then we have those idjit good folks who are so concerned about America that they formed the for profit "Tea Party Nation". Yes, they put a lot of work into the organization of the convention but so did Ford when he was building the biggest automobile company in the Free United States. Sad when anyone makes a bundle off of the fears of a group of people whose family lost the dueling banjos.

MOONSHINE PARTY

The "Tea Party" should really change it's name to the "Anti-Revenuer Party". They could not have chosen a better location than Opryland nor a better keynote speaker than Sarah Palin to highlight the true disposition of their cause celeb. If they get all of the "moonshiners", "poachers", "NASCAR fans", watchers of HEE HAW and ANDY GRIFFITH reruns behind them they might be able have The Constitution translated into Hillbilly.

The sad part of this is that it probably represents 50% of white Americans.

Also anyone reading this stuff would think that I am one of them, as I do not really edit that which I rite, wright, right, rat, write . One of them should be rite

Yes, I must admit that I do hunt and own firearms, enjoy classic country music on occasion, and did chuckle at the antics of Barney Fife and his replacement, Sarah Palin, and I do despise the current wrongful serfdom (taxation) laid upon us by arrogant condescending politicians. Perhaps a party launching itself in Opryland hopes to attract people who understand more than moonshine recipes, don't even know the name Dale Earnhardt nor Toby Keith.


I must also say that I know nothing about the "TEA Party". Have they put together a platform? Do they have a true substantial agenda? Do they have a strategic plan to really affect change? Or do they just think that they can bully those in power to cower down?

These people currently holding power will say anything to remain in power and can not be trusted to do what they promise before election day. A true meaning- full agenda would be concentrating on three or four vulnerable senatorial seat and perhaps ten to twelve congressional posts. Anyone would be fool to attempt a third party candidate for president at this stage. Remember Ross Perot? Upset Americans turned the Oval Office into Slick Willies "Play Pen"! Do you think that Letterman took the idea for cigars from Clinton?

On another note. Has anyone noticed that when the African-American (was it Woodrow Wilson who said, "Never trust a person with a Hyphenated description of himself,"?) president speaks he so often has his head and chin raised as if speaking down to a very lower class than his exalted self?

Every politician should be named "Moses"! Only because when they open their mouths the bull rushes out!